The Judicial Response to Mass Police Surveillance
University of Illinois College of Law; University of California, Berkeley - Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program
November 8, 2011
University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Vol. 2011, No. 2, p. 281, 2011
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1956787
The increasingly widespread use of police technologies like surveillance cameras, facial recognition software, and automatic license plate recognition (ALPR) systems threaten to fundamentally reshape our expectations to privacy in public spaces. These technologies are capable of recording copious amounts of personal data in an unprecedentedly efficient manner; I refer to the proliferation of these new technologies as the development of the digitally efficient investigative state. The legislative branch has not acted to address the tangible harms posed by this new technological order. I argue that the courts ought to respond to this burgeoning threat by treading a new doctrinal path to limit the indiscriminate collection of personal data. The courts are institutionally competent to craft an appropriate response and properly positioned to address the unique majoritarian concerns implicated by widespread police surveillance. I also contend that the development of the digitally efficient investigative state should serve as a medium for the courts to more systematically reassess our Fourth Amendment doctrine, in recognition of the transformative and pervasive effects of emerging technologies on individual privacy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: Fourth Amendment, Police, Surveillance, Technology, Privacy, Data, License Plate Reader, Facial Recognition, Global Positioning System, GPS, Jones, Maynard
JEL Classification: K14, K30, K10, K00, K20, K30, K39, K40, K49Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 10, 2011 ; Last revised: August 13, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds