A Special Rule for Compound Protection for DNA Sequences - Impact of the ECJ 'Monsanto' Decision on Patent Practice
Jan B. Krauss
University of Washington School of Law
University of Washington - School of Law
August 1, 2011
Journal of the Patent and Trademark Society, Vol. 93, p. 189, 2011
University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-18
In Monsanto v. Cefetra, the European Court of Justice narrowly interpreted Article 9 of EU Biotech Directive and adopted a “function-limited” or “purpose-bound” protection for DNA sequence patents although the asserted claims are directed to an isolated DNA sequence, i.e., a compound without any limitation in view of its function or purpose. This paper argues that such restrictive interpretation was not only unnecessary but also conflicts with the principle of claim interpretation provided in European Patent Convention Article 69, which will lead to a lot of uncertainty in the protection scope and patentability of DNA sequence patents. It also discusses impacts of Monsanto on claim drafting and examination practice at the European Patent Office.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: DNA, patents, biotechnologyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 10, 2011 ; Last revised: November 10, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 2.844 seconds