Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1957679
 


 



The Citadel Survives a Naval Bombardment: A Policy Analysis of the Economic Loss Doctrine


Steven R. Swanson


Hamline University - School of Law

January 1, 1987

Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Vol. 12, p. 135, 1987

Abstract:     
The citadel remains a barrier against recovery for losses that can be labeled purely “economic.” Economic losses are damages to the product itself or consequential damages to the economic interests of the injured party. This analysis begins with an examination of the products liability decisions of common law courts relating to the economic loss doctrine. The same questions are then reviewed in the admiralty context. After an examination of the important policy considerations implicated in the dispute, the article will suggest a preferred approach for courts faced with the economic loss issue. Finally, the probable impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in East River will be examined in light of the preferred approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Economic, loss doctrine, admiralty, UCC, warranty provisions, Seely, citadel, economic loss, East River, Erie

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 17, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Swanson, Steven R., The Citadel Survives a Naval Bombardment: A Policy Analysis of the Economic Loss Doctrine (January 1, 1987). Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Vol. 12, p. 135, 1987. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1957679

Contact Information

Steven R. Swanson (Contact Author)
Hamline University - School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 80
Downloads: 5

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds