Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1959406
 
 

Footnotes (271)



 


 



The Forgotten Foundations of Hart and Sacks


Charles L. Barzun


University of Virginia School of Law

November 14, 2011

Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2011-44

Abstract:     
The set of teaching materials known as The Legal Process continue to exert tremendous influence over mainstream public-law scholarship. Developed by Harvard Law Professors Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks in the late 1950s, those materials formed the cornerstone of the legal education of generations of lawyers, judges, and legal scholars. In part for that reason, the methods of legal interpretation and institutional analysis they articulated arguably still constitute the reigning paradigm of scholarship in the areas of statutory interpretation, federal courts, and administrative law.

Despite their pervasive influence, however, the philosophical and jurisprudential foundations of The Legal Process are poorly understood. The standard historical account of the text denies any such foundations exist, characterizing it instead as an effort by its editors to respond to the skeptical threat of Legal Realism by advancing an “instrumentalist” or “neutral” theory of law that denied the need for, or value of, any deeper philosophical justification. Though originally offered as a critique of the approach embodied in the teaching materials, that account has been accepted even by those working within the Legal Process framework.

That acceptance is surprising and troubling, because the standard historical account is deeply mistaken. In the first chapter of The Legal Process, the editors consciously advance controversial positions on the nature of morality, law, and legal knowledge. And if one looks carefully at those positions and the sources the editors rely on in staking them out, one can see that they were trying to construct a model of legal practice and scholarship based on the metaphysical and epistemological doctrines of one strand of philosophical pragmatism. Understanding such philosophical commitments not only enables us to better explain how Hart and Sacks took themselves to be responding to Legal Realism, but also forces us to consider how more recent efforts to ground legal practice fare in comparison.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: Coleman, Kraus, Legal Rights, Thomson, Feinberg, torts, necessity, economic, liberal

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 14, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Barzun, Charles L., The Forgotten Foundations of Hart and Sacks (November 14, 2011). Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2011-44. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1959406 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1959406

Contact Information

Charles L. Barzun (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-6454 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,265
Downloads: 237
Download Rank: 75,828
Footnotes:  271

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.516 seconds