Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1959489
 
 

Footnotes (165)



 


 



Prevention as the Primary Goal of Sentencing: The Modern Case for Indeterminate Dispositions in Criminal Cases


Christopher Slobogin


Vanderbilt University - Law School

November 10, 2011

San Diego Law Review, Vol. 48, 2011
Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 11-31
Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-43

Abstract:     
Among modern-day legal academics determinate sentencing and limiting retributivism tend to be preferred over indeterminate sentencing, at least in part because the latter option is viewed as immoral. This Article contends to the contrary that, properly constituted, indeterminate sentencing is both a morally defensible method of preventing crime and the optimal regime for doing so. More specifically, the position defended in this Article is that, once a person is convicted of such an offense, the duration and nature of sentence should be based on a back-end decision made by experts in recidivism reduction, within very broad ranges set by the legislature. The territory covered in this Article, particularly as it addresses the debate between deontological retributivists and utilitarians, is well-trodden. But this Article seeks to provide new perspectives on the morality, legality, and practicality of indeterminate sentencing. It starts with an outline of what a properly constituted indeterminate sentencing regime would look like. It then defends this regime against numerous objections.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: sentencing, indeterminate sentences, risk assessment, parole, criminal punishment, principle of legality, preventive detention

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 14, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Slobogin, Christopher, Prevention as the Primary Goal of Sentencing: The Modern Case for Indeterminate Dispositions in Criminal Cases (November 10, 2011). San Diego Law Review, Vol. 48, 2011; Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 11-31; Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-43. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1959489

Contact Information

Christopher Slobogin (Contact Author)
Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )
131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 950
Downloads: 222
Download Rank: 77,944
Footnotes:  165

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.312 seconds