Feminist Prosecutors and Patriarchal States

Kit Kinports

Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law

November 14, 2011

Criminal Law & Philosophy, Forthcoming

In Prosecuting Domestic Violence: A Philosophical Analysis, Michelle Dempsey focuses on the dilemma prosecutors face when domestic violence victims are unwilling to cooperate in the criminal prosecution of their abusive partners. Starting from the premise that the ultimate goal should be putting an end to domestic violence, Dempsey urges prosecutors to act as feminists in deciding how to proceed in such cases. Doing so, Dempsey argues, will tend to make the character of the prosecutor’s community and state less patriarchal and thus help stamp out domestic violence. This article analyzes two issues arising from Dempsey’s work: first, whether prosecutors can justifiably be viewed as representatives of their states and communities; and, second, how prosecutors committed to using their discretion to battle both domestic violence and patriarchy would go about determining in a particular case whether to pursue criminal charges against the wishes of a victim.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 16, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Kinports, Kit, Feminist Prosecutors and Patriarchal States (November 14, 2011). Criminal Law & Philosophy, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1959712

Contact Information

Kit Kinports (Contact Author)
Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law ( email )
Lewis Katz Building
Room 335
University Park, PA 16802
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 428
Downloads: 74
Download Rank: 216,395

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds