Keynote: Before and After the Summary Judgment Trilogy
Suja A. Thomas
University of Illinois College of Law
April 11, 2012
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 43, 2012
Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 11-08
In this keynote speech for the Seattle University School of Law Colloquium on the 25th Anniversary of the Summary Judgment Trilogy: Reflections on Summary Judgment, Professor Suja Thomas discusses access to courts and juries before and after the summary judgment trilogy. Following up on debate in the academic literature on the effect of the trilogy on summary judgment, Professor Thomas explores influences on the trilogy and influences of the trilogy outside of summary judgment. She first describes Supreme Court decisions on judgment notwithstanding the verdict, remittitur, and the directed verdict, which helped set the stage for the trilogy. She then explores access after the trilogy. Professor Thomas describes how access to courts and juries continued to decline through the Supreme Court’s decisions on arbitration and the motion to dismiss. Professor Thomas gives all of these procedures some context by showing their effect on one class of factually intensive cases — employment discrimination cases. She concludes by introducing the concept of “the Other Branch” and states that access to courts and juries can possibly increase if the jury is viewed in this manner.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: trilogy, summary judgment, motion to dismiss, remittitur, arbitration, judgment as a matter of law, directed verdict, jury, trials
JEL Classification: ZooAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 15, 2011 ; Last revised: January 19, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds