Justice Stevens, Religious Enthusiast
Northwestern University School of Law
December 7, 2011
Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 11-64
It is sometimes alleged that Justice John Paul Stevens is hostile to religion. In fact, however, Justice Stevens espouses a position with religious roots and enthusiastically embraces a distinct conception of religion. This casts doubt on the claim, made in different ways by Eduardo Peñalver and Christopher Eisgruber, that the fundamental concern of his religion clause jurisprudence is equality. At least as important to him is protecting religion from corruption by the state.
Stevens’s position, in order to be consistent, ought to acknowledge, more forthrightly than he does, that it treats religion as a distinctive human good. Any notion of corruption implies a norm or ideal state from which the corruption is a falling off. An invocation of the corruption rationale presupposes that religion is a good thing deserving of protection. To call this view hostile to religion is confused to the point of perversity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: Justice Stevens, Religious Enthusiast, hostile to religion
JEL Classification: K10. K19, K30, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 5, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.421 seconds