|
||||
|
||||
What Really Matters in Spectrum Allocation DesignThomas W. HazlettGeorge Mason University Dept. of Economics and School of Law Roberto E. MunozUniversidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria Diego Bernardo AvanziniCentral Bank of Chile; George Mason University School of Law October 27, 2011 Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Forthcoming George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 11-48 Abstract: Wireless license auctions have successfully replaced “beauty contests” in many countries. Competitive bidding (1) puts spectrum rights in the hands of the most productive firms; (2) reduces rent-seeking costs; and (3) captures license values for the public, potentially reducing costly tax distortions. Economists and policy makers have asymmetrically focused on (3). Yet, the overwhelming consumer welfare gains are produced in output (retail services) markets, not by extracting revenues from the sale of spectrum inputs. This fact leads to powerful policy implications, supporting liberal policies that permit market rivals to (quickly) access abundant bandwidth.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48 Keywords: CMRS, CTIA, cellular, Connecting America, data services, FCC, Federal Communications Commission National Broadband Plan, IMF, International Monetary Fund, Internet, John McMillan, market inefficiencies, MOU, Milgrom, minutes of use, mobile telephone, networks, Paul Klemperer, text messages, web JEL Classification: L96 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 17, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.375 seconds