Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1961442
 
 

Footnotes (113)



 


 



Has Garcetti Destroyed Academic Freedom?


Harvey Gilmore


Monroe College

August 5, 2011

University of Massachusetts Roundtable Symposium Law Journal, Vol. 6, 2011

Abstract:     
The case of Garcetti v. Ceballos, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2006, established that a public employee's job related communications are not protected by the First Amendment. The Court also held that an employer has the right to impose disciplinary sanctions against that employee based on those job related communications.

Although the Court specifically did not address how its decision would affect public university professors in the future, Garcetti has already alarmed academicians who believe in the concept of academic freedom.

College professors, especially those who teach in research institutions, are now concerned that the Garcetti decision poses a serious threat to academic freedom. In academia, the perceived threat is that in the future, cases similar to Garcetti will lead to public university professors losing their First Amendment protection, and thus be subject to discipline for their on the job speech.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 18, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Gilmore, Harvey, Has Garcetti Destroyed Academic Freedom? (August 5, 2011). University of Massachusetts Roundtable Symposium Law Journal, Vol. 6, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1961442

Contact Information

Harvey Gilmore (Contact Author)
Monroe College ( email )
School of Business & Accounting
2375 Jerome Avenue
Bronx, NY 10468
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 244
Downloads: 43
Footnotes:  113

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds