Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (5)



 


 



Preserving Law School’s Signature Pedagogy and Great Subjects


Nelson Pierce Miller


Thomas M. Cooley Law School

Heather Garretson


Thomas M. Cooley Law School

May 1, 2009

Michigan Bar Journal, Vol. 88, No. 5, p. 46, 2009

Abstract:     
In this co-authored article, the authors argue that in their rush to reform legal education consistent with the recommendations of the Carnegie Foundation report "Educating Lawyers," law schools should not reject their signature Socratic Examination pedagogy or foundational first-year subjects. Tort law, contracts, criminal law, property law, and constitutional law are foundations for any civil society. The first-year curriculum of law schools prepares lawyers to become responsible citizens and effective practitioners. Socratic Examination as a signature pedagogy develops professional identity and advocacy skills. Law schools should balance reforms with valuing their current practices.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: legal education, reform, pedagogy, Socratic, curriculum, traditional, advocacy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Miller, Nelson Pierce and Garretson, Heather, Preserving Law School’s Signature Pedagogy and Great Subjects (May 1, 2009). Michigan Bar Journal, Vol. 88, No. 5, p. 46, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1961679

Contact Information

Nelson Pierce Miller (Contact Author)
Thomas M. Cooley Law School ( email )
300 S. Capitol Avenue
P.O. Box 13038
Lansing, MI 48901
United States
Heather Garretson
Thomas M. Cooley Law School ( email )
300 S. Capitol Avenue
P.O. Box 13038
Lansing, MI 48901
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 114
Downloads: 9
Footnotes:  5

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.485 seconds