|
||||
|
||||
Preserving Law School’s Signature Pedagogy and Great SubjectsNelson Pierce MillerThomas M. Cooley Law School Heather GarretsonThomas M. Cooley Law School May 1, 2009 Michigan Bar Journal, Vol. 88, No. 5, p. 46, 2009 Abstract: In this co-authored article, the authors argue that in their rush to reform legal education consistent with the recommendations of the Carnegie Foundation report "Educating Lawyers," law schools should not reject their signature Socratic Examination pedagogy or foundational first-year subjects. Tort law, contracts, criminal law, property law, and constitutional law are foundations for any civil society. The first-year curriculum of law schools prepares lawyers to become responsible citizens and effective practitioners. Socratic Examination as a signature pedagogy develops professional identity and advocacy skills. Law schools should balance reforms with valuing their current practices.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 4 Keywords: legal education, reform, pedagogy, Socratic, curriculum, traditional, advocacy Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 19, 2011Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.485 seconds