Abstract

 


 



Rethinking Justice Reform in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States: The Capacity of Development Agencies and Lessons from Liberia and Afghanistan


Deval Desai


University of London, School of Oriental & African Studies - School of Law

Deborah Isser


World Bank - Law and Justice (LEGAL)

Michael Woolcock


World Bank - Development Research Group; Harvard University - Kennedy School of Government

November 21, 2011

WORLD BANK LEGAL REVIEW: INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND GLOBAL LEGAL GOVERNANCE, Vol. 3, Cisse, Bradlow, Kingsbury, eds., World Bank, 2011

Abstract:     
Over the last four decades, donor-driven justice reform efforts have largely followed two parallel paradigms: one primarily concerned with promoting development and economic growth, the other centered on state-building and the consolidation of peace in countries emerging from violent conflict. These paradigms have increasingly converged in recent years, with development actors embracing some of the concepts underpinning justice aspects of state building, as articulated in the World Development Report 2011 (on conflict and security). As the WDR 2011 correctly recognizes, however, these operational models share a powerful conviction – reinforced by broader organizational imperatives promoting the rapid dissemination and scale-up of universal ‘best practices’ – that reform of justice institutions is optimally achieved by replicating structures deemed successful elsewhere. These models also face the same conundrum: on the one hand, a powerful North/South, left/right consensus that justice (or ‘the rule of law’) is vital in its own right and to achieving key development objectives, and yet, on the other, an operational track record demonstrating that much remains to be learned. We examine the dual analytical dynamics underpinning these models, and argue that, in order to avoid mutual reinforcement of their respective weaknesses, the time is ripe to re-conceptualize approaches to justice reform in fragile and conflict-affected states, and to explore their implications for alternative operational strategies. Building on the remarks of Liberia’s Minister of Justice Christiana Tah and Afghanistan’s Chief Justice Azimi at the World Bank’s Law, Justice and Development forum in November 2010, we argue that enhancing the efficacy of these initiatives requires an alternative theory of change, a long-term commitment to investing in research to understand the idiosyncrasies of local contexts, and a far more nuanced and calibrated approach to building locally legitimate justice institutions capable of mitigating the societal stresses that feed cycles of conflict.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: fragility, conflict, justice, rule of law, World Development Report 2011, Afghanistan, Liberia

JEL Classification: F35, K33, O19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 25, 2011 ; Last revised: June 25, 2012

Suggested Citation

Desai, Deval, Isser, Deborah and Woolcock, Michael, Rethinking Justice Reform in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States: The Capacity of Development Agencies and Lessons from Liberia and Afghanistan (November 21, 2011). WORLD BANK LEGAL REVIEW: INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND GLOBAL LEGAL GOVERNANCE, Vol. 3, Cisse, Bradlow, Kingsbury, eds., World Bank, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1962962

Contact Information

Deval Desai (Contact Author)
University of London, School of Oriental & African Studies - School of Law ( email )
London, WC1H 0XG
United Kingdom
Deborah Isser
World Bank - Law and Justice (LEGAL) ( email )
1818 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20433
United States
Michael Woolcock
World Bank - Development Research Group ( email )
1818 H. Street, N.W.
Mailstop MC3-306
Washington, DC 20433
United States
202-473-9258 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://econ.worldbank.org/staff/mwoolcock
Harvard University - Kennedy School of Government ( email )
Littauer-G-11G
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-0911 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://ksgfaculty.harvard.edu/michael_woolcock
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 351
Downloads: 96
Download Rank: 139,030

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.610 seconds