Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1963335
 


 



The Primary Right


Carter Dillard


Visiting Scholar, Vulnerability and Human Condition Initiative, Feminism and Legal Theory Project, Emory University School of Law.

May 21, 2012

Pace Environmental Law (PELR) Review, Vol. 29, Spring 2012
Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 11-180

Abstract:     
As climate change materializes, legal theorists face the urgent need to develop a normative baseline for environmental regulation. Meanwhile, in the seemingly unrelated field of political exit theory, theorists have presumed that while one ought to be able to exit any polity one cannot exit all polities. This essay challenges that presumption, and simultaneously addresses the baseline problem in environmental law, by combining the analyses to develop a new human right derived from exit right theory called the primary right: a general claim-right of reasonable access to wilderness. The derivation is simple: If consent is necessary to justify political association, it is necessary to justify any amount of political association. And, if one has the right to refuse to consent to and exit any polity one has the right to refuse to consent to and exit all polities. To exit all polities completely so that the polity holds no residual power, control and influence over the person exiting would require her having access to, and therefore the continued existence of, nonpolity, or wilderness. If wilderness ceases to exist, or cannot be reasonably accessed, one has no alternative to political association and cannot be truly autonomous. Nonconsent becomes impossible.

The primary right is a candidate for a revolutionary “first generation” human right to a baseline environment, a right already reflected in the core principals of liberal political philosophy, as well as domestic environmental legislation like the Wilderness and Endangered Species Acts. The primary right synthesizes these typically separate and seemingly conflicting strands of thought, liberal political and environmental theory, to recognize particular duties that can serve as the foundation for a new regime of domestic and international laws that protects both autonomy and the nonhuman world. It adds to the literature by forcing us to see the nonhuman world as a medium by which humans exert power over each other, and by proposing that the baseline for environmental law, that field of law which regulates the relationship between humans and the nonhuman world, should be the nonhuman world itself. Properly understood, liberalism values the nonhuman world because only access to it, which provides a baseline from which we can consent to the human world, can justify consensual political association.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 23, 2011 ; Last revised: August 2, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dillard, Carter, The Primary Right (May 21, 2012). Pace Environmental Law (PELR) Review, Vol. 29, Spring 2012; Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 11-180. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1963335 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1963335

Contact Information

Carter Dillard (Contact Author)
Visiting Scholar, Vulnerability and Human Condition Initiative, Feminism and Legal Theory Project, Emory University School of Law. ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 668
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 149,354

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.250 seconds