Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1963973
 
 

Footnotes (121)



 


 



A Chip Off the Old Iceblock: How Cryopreservation Has Changed Estate Law, Why Attempts to Address the Issue Have Fallen Short, and How to Fix It


Benjamin C. Carpenter


University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota)

2011

Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 21, 2012
U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-37

Abstract:     
For thousands of years, the process for determining one’s heirs remained unchanged. For a woman, her heirs were fixed at her death; for a man, his heirs were fixed no later than nine months after his death. Then came cryopreservation and, with it, the ability for individuals to conceive children years after their death. This development has created many — largely unanswered — questions. While posthumous conception implicates numerous moral, ethical, and legal issues, this Article focuses on the legal status of posthumously conceived children in the estate law context.

Despite pleas from both courts and commentators, few legislatures have been willing to tackle this sensitive topic. Most judges and scholars who have addressed it agree the three primary goals of any response should be to ensure the efficient administration of estates, carry out the decedent’s intent, and protect the children’s best interests. However, no consensus has emerged regarding which of these goals should receive priority. These goals need not be mutually exclusive, though, but can each be achieved with appropriate legislation. In this Article, I take a critical look at the statutory and judicial approaches proposed to date, break down the strengths and weaknesses of each, and introduce two new concepts that bridge the gaps in the prior approaches. Specifically, statutes should (1) separate the question of whether a posthumously conceived child is an heir from whether the child will in fact inherit assets, and (2) provide fiduciaries discretion to distribute or retain assets when cryopreserved genetic material exists, based on certain conditions. These improvements will provide flexibility not found in prior approaches and, as a result, advance each of the three key goals. This Article provides legislatures, judges, and commentators who tackle this issue with both a comprehensive historical perspective on the issue and a blueprint to follow going forward.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 82

Keywords: probate, trust, wills, estates, assisted reproduction, cryopreservation, posthumous conception

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 25, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Carpenter, Benjamin C., A Chip Off the Old Iceblock: How Cryopreservation Has Changed Estate Law, Why Attempts to Address the Issue Have Fallen Short, and How to Fix It (2011). Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 21, 2012; U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-37. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1963973

Contact Information

Benjamin C. Carpenter (Contact Author)
University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota) ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 728
Downloads: 124
Download Rank: 134,602
Footnotes:  121

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.296 seconds