|
||||
|
||||
A New Look at Reporting Fraud: By ExchangeDouglas CummingYork University - Schulich School of Business Sofia JohanYork University - Schulich School of Business; Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) November 24, 2011 TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2011-050 Abstract: Statistics reporting litigated cases of fraud on an exchange-by-exchange basis are not readily available to investors. This paper introduces data from three countries with multiple exchanges with different listing standards, – Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States – to show litigated cases of fraud significantly vary by country, and the different exchanges within the country. Comparisons are also made to Brazil, China and Germany to assess out-of-sample inferences. The data examined suggest listing standards have a strong influence over the nature of observed fraud by securities commissions within the United States; by contrast, outside the United States there appears to be a comparative lack of enforcement. The data also suggest policy implications for the ways in which fraud ought to be reported to improve investor kowledge, market transparency and market quality.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 39 Keywords: Corporate fraud, Exchange listing standards, Securities commissions, NYSE JEL Classification: G32, J33 working papers seriesDate posted: November 25, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds