Uses of History as Legitimation in Soviet - Type Regimes

Fred Eidlin

Charles University


Bohemia, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 135-138, 1995

All regimes use history for purposes of legitimation, but since communists have traditionally heaped scorn on the idea that a regime ought to seek legitimation through the holding of elections through which the ruling party might actually have to give up its hold on power, the weight placed on history of legitimation becomes considerably greater than it is for most other kinds of regimes. Stalinist regimes did not try to persuade their peoples of the truth of this theory. It simply terrorized them into reciting the official theory as liturgy and systematically suppressed criticism and all competing views. As the ideological glue that had bound the Communist rank and file to blind, unquestioning acceptance of the policies of the ruling elite weakened, historical interpretation naturally had to be increasingly promoted by argument rather than imposed. As historiography becomes more sophisticated and historians more familiar with the behavior of the regime, it becomes increasingly difficult for the partisans of a monolithic regime to decide on the criteria necessary for a total control and manipulation of history.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: history, legitimation, legitimacy, communism, communist regimes, Stalinism

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 28, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Eidlin, Fred, Uses of History as Legitimation in Soviet - Type Regimes (1989). Bohemia, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 135-138, 1995. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1965436

Contact Information

Fred Eidlin (Contact Author)
Charles University ( email )
U krize 8
Prague, 158 00
Czech Republic
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 136
Downloads: 9

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.359 seconds