A Degree of Practical Wisdom: The Ratio of Educational Debt to Income as a Basic Measurement of Law School Graduates’ Economic Viability

24 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2011 Last revised: 31 Dec 2012

See all articles by James Ming Chen

James Ming Chen

Michigan State University - College of Law

Abstract

This article evaluates the economic viability of a student’s decision to borrow money in order to attend law school. For individuals, firms, and entire nations, the ratio of debt to income serves as a measure of economic stability. The ease with which a student can carry and retire educational debt after graduation may be the simplest measure of educational return on investment.

Mortgage lenders evaluate prospective borrowers' debt-to-income ratios. The spread between the front-end and back-end ratios in mortgage lending provides a basis for extrapolating the maximum amount of educational debt that a student should incur. Any student whose debt service exceeds the maximum permissible spread between mortgage lenders' front-end and back-end ratios will not be able to buy a house on credit.

These measures of affordability suggest that the maximum educational back-end ratio (EBER) should fall in a range between 8 and 12 percent of monthly gross income. Four percent would be even better. Other metrics of economic viability in servicing educational debt suggest that the ratio of total educational debt to annual income (EDAI) should range from an ideal 0.5 to a marginal 1.5.

EBER and EDAI are mathematically related ways of measuring the same thing: a student's ability to discharge educational debt through enhanced earnings. This article offers guidance on the use of these debt-to-income ratios to assess the economic viability of students who borrow money in order to attend law school.

Keywords: law school, education, debt, EBER, EDAI

JEL Classification: K00, I22, J60, N30

Suggested Citation

Chen, James Ming, A Degree of Practical Wisdom: The Ratio of Educational Debt to Income as a Basic Measurement of Law School Graduates’ Economic Viability. William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 38, 2012, University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2011-17, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1967266

James Ming Chen (Contact Author)

Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )

318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,078
Abstract Views
10,469
Rank
37,793
PlumX Metrics