Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1967462
 
 

References (38)



 
 

Citations (16)



 


 



Speculative Betas


Harrison G. Hong


Princeton University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

David Alexandre Sraer


University of California, Berkeley; Princeton University

May 27, 2015


Abstract:     
The risk and return trade-off, the cornerstone of modern asset pricing theory, is often of the wrong sign. Our explanation is that high beta assets are more prone to speculative overpricing than low beta ones. When investors disagree about the prospects of the stock market, high beta assets are more sensitive to this aggregate disagreement and experience a greater divergence of opinion about their payoffs. If their dividends’ variance is low enough, these assets experience speculative demand from optimistic investors. Short-sales constraints then result in these high beta assets being over-priced. When aggregate disagreement is low, the Security Market Line is upward sloping due to risk-sharing. When aggregate disagreement is high, expected returns can actually decrease with beta, especially for stocks with low idiosyncratic variance. We confirm our theory using a measure of disagreement about stock market earnings.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 79


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 3, 2011 ; Last revised: July 28, 2015

Suggested Citation

Hong, Harrison G. and Sraer , David Alexandre, Speculative Betas (May 27, 2015). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1967462 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1967462

Contact Information

Harrison G. Hong (Contact Author)
Princeton University - Department of Economics ( email )
Princeton, NJ 08544-1021
United States
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
David Alexandre Sraer
University of California, Berkeley ( email )
310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States
Princeton University ( email )
22 Chambers Street
Princeton, NJ 08544
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 10,723
Downloads: 2,257
Download Rank: 3,233
References:  38
Citations:  16

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds