Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1967610
 


 



The Supreme Court and the Environment: The Reluctant Protector


Michael Allan Wolf


University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law

December 2, 2011

Michael Allan Wolf, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE ENVIRONMENT: THE RELUCTANT PROTECTOR, CQ Press/Sage, 2012

Abstract:     
This document contains the Introduction and Contents for The Supreme Court and the Environment: The Reluctant Protector (CQ Press/Sage 2012). When one views the body of modern environmental law — the decisions and the other key documents — the picture that emerges is not one of Supreme Court dominance. In this legal drama, the justices have most often played supporting roles. While we can find the occasional, memorable soliloquy in a Supreme Court majority, concurring, or dissenting opinion, the leading men and women are more likely found in Congress, administrative agencies, state and local legislatures, nongovernmental organizations, private industry, and state and lower federal courts.

What one learns from studying the Supreme Court’s environmental law output is that the justices for the most part seem more concerned about more general issues of deference to administrative agencies, the rules of statutory interpretation, the role of legislative history, the requisites for standing, and the nature of the Takings Clause than the narrow issues of entitlement to a clean environment, the notion of an environmental ethic that underlies written statutes and regulations, and concerns about ecological diversity and other environmental values. When we widen the lens, however, and focus on the other documents that make up essential parts of the story of the Supreme Court and the environment — complaints by litigants, briefs by parties and by friends of the court, oral argument transcripts, the occasional stirring dissent, lower court decisions, presidential signing statements and press conference transcripts, media reports and editorials, and legislative responses to high court decisions — we discover what is often missing in the body of Supreme Court decisions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: environmental law, land use planning, constitutional history, supreme court, environmental history, legal history

JEL Classification: K32, K10

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 2, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Wolf, Michael Allan, The Supreme Court and the Environment: The Reluctant Protector (December 2, 2011). Michael Allan Wolf, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE ENVIRONMENT: THE RELUCTANT PROTECTOR, CQ Press/Sage, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1967610

Contact Information

Michael Allan Wolf (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352-273-0934 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/wolf/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 558
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 186,320

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.843 seconds