Comment on Uhlmann, Poehlman, and Nosek
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
December 4, 2011
IDEOLOGY, PSYCHOLOGY, AND LAW, Jon Larson, ed., Oxford University Press, 2012
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 11-38
The question “person or culture?” matters for law and policy because at issue is the viability of a new sort of “cultural defense.” That defense says that the (oftenembarrassing) automatic associations aren’t really measuring “me”; instead, they are measuring something about “culture.” So don’t blame me, and don’t hold me responsible. Uhlmann, Poehlman, and Nosek’s chapter demonstrates that a strong version of the cultural defense - that it has absolutely nothing to do with me - cannot withstand the evidence of predictive validity.
What about a weaker version that concedes that automatic associations have something to do with me and have some predictive power, but that they do not amount to an “attitude” and instead influence behavior via “social norms”? In this brief Comment, I argue that from an ethical and legal perspective, it is unclear what if anything should turn on that fine distinction in state of mind. Far more important are two simple questions: First, do we consciously endorse the automatic associations in our heads? Second, what will we do to counter the automatic associations we consciously reject?
Number of Pages in PDF File: 4
Keywords: implicit bias, culture, cultural defenseAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 5, 2011 ; Last revised: January 4, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds