Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1968429
 
 

Footnotes (81)



 


 



Sense and Severability


Tobias A. Dorsey


Tobias A. Dorsey - (Attorney In Federal Practice)

December 5, 2011

University of Richmond Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
When the Supreme Court holds that part of an act is unconstitutional and must be stricken, what does it do with the rest? In almost every case, there is an implicit assumption -- shared by every party and every Justice -- that the rest of the act should stand, preserving as much of the functionality of the act as possible. In politically charged cases, however, the Court applies this functional assumption to most of the act, but then isolates a few provisions and applies a political preference test to those provisions -- preserving those provisions only if Congress would have wanted them preserved. The Court's political preference test is a test that has not been applied consistently and cannot be applied with any certainty. Accordingly, it may be unconstitutionally vague. Regardless, it is unseemly and unreliable. It is also unwise, because the test as formulated by the Court is so open-ended -- its consequences so potentially broad -- that every case not only allows, but actually invites, an argument that the Court should strike down an entire act. This leaves the entire statute book fraught with uncertainty, because the Court has left open the possibility in every case that it may strike far more broadly than the Constitution requires if there is a political justification for doing so. The Court should discard the political preference test. If part of an act is unconstitutional, the Court should strike that part, and leave the rest alone.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 6, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Dorsey, Tobias A., Sense and Severability (December 5, 2011). University of Richmond Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1968429 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1968429

Contact Information

Tobias A. Dorsey (Contact Author)
Tobias A. Dorsey - (Attorney In Federal Practice) ( email )
One Columbus Circle, NE
Washington, DC 20002
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 479
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 224,971
Footnotes:  81

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.265 seconds