Voting for Justices: Change and Continuity in Confirmation Voting 1937-2010
Charles M. Cameron
Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and Department of Politics; New York University School of Law
Jonathan P. Kastellec
Princeton University - Department of Politics
Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
December 2, 2011
The contentiousness of Senate voting on Supreme Court nominations increased dramatically from 1937-2010. We identify four potential sources of the increase: 1) changes in the Senate; 2) changes in the nominees; 3) changes in the political environment; and, 4) changes in senators' evaluative criteria. Using new data and improved statistical techniques, we estimate a well-performing model of senators' individual voting choices on Supreme Court nominees. Simulations allow an evaluation of the contribution of the four classes of factors to increased contentiousness. The principal source of increased contentiousness was the combination of increasingly extreme nominees and an increasingly polarized Senate. Also significant was the increased mobilization of interest groups. In sum, increased contentiousness seems largely to reflect the ideological polarization of American political elites.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: Supreme Court, Senate, nominations, roll call votes, polarization, interest groups, raceworking papers series
Date posted: December 6, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds