Abstract

 


 



Reproductive Choices and Informed Consent: Fetal Interests, Women’s Identity and Relational Autonomy


Pamela Laufer-Ukeles


University of Dayton - School of Law

December 5, 2011

American Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2011

Abstract:     
In this Article, I describe and examine the severe shortcomings in women’s autonomy in the context of reproductive choices in the medical arena. The reproductive choices I explore are those choices that involve gestation: abortion, fertility treatments, and interventions during pregnancy. Due to state and medical interests in the fetus, I describe how information conveyed to patients making reproductive choices is biased towards fetal interests, relies on female stereotypes, and is still conveyed with the objective authority of the medical profession. Moreover, reproductive choices implicate women’s values and identity interests that reach beyond medical concerns, which are not part of the informed consent doctrine at all. The narrow, individualistic informed consent torts doctrine intended to protect patient autonomy does not do enough in this context to balance bias nor does it mandate discussion of important identity interests and values. Accordingly, I argue that when faced with reproductive choices, women are not provided the balanced and comprehensive information needed to promote their autonomy.

In response to the breakdown in patient autonomy I describe, instead of leaving women alone to make choices or regulating in order to protect them from their choices, a broader framework for supporting reproductive choices should be established. In light of the interdependence of woman and fetus, as well as the broader social context shaping these decisions, I argue that a more contextual, relational perspective of autonomy should be the goal of informed consent in the context of reproductive choices. I suggest a number of reforms that aim to optimize patient autonomy from a relational perspective. I suggest a broad, deliberative doctor-patient consultation and legal reforms that create more balance between the pull towards intervention and fetal protection on the one hand, and non-intervention and protection of women’s personal identity interests on the other.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: informed consent, reproductive rights, abortion, maternal-fetal tension, relational autonomy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 8, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Laufer-Ukeles, Pamela, Reproductive Choices and Informed Consent: Fetal Interests, Women’s Identity and Relational Autonomy (December 5, 2011). American Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1968717

Contact Information

Pamela Laufer-Ukeles (Contact Author)
University of Dayton - School of Law ( email )
300 College Park
Dayton, OH 45469
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 673
Downloads: 137
Download Rank: 105,989

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.500 seconds