Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (366)



 


 



That Which We Call a Bank: Revisiting the History of Bank Holding Company Regulation in the United States


Saule T. Omarova


University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law

Margaret E. Tahyar


Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

December 7, 2011

Review of Banking and Financial Law, Vol. 31, 2011-2012

Abstract:     
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) has elevated the importance of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “BHCA”) – the key statute governing activities and affiliations of U.S. bank holding companies (“BHCs”) – by effectively using it as the model for regulation and supervision of all systemically important financial institutions. The BHCA regulatory regime, however, is a product of unique historical circumstances, which reflects shifting patterns in political and economic struggles and compromises. This Article examines one crucial aspect of this rich and multi-faceted history: the evolution of the BHCA definition of a “bank” and the main statutory exemptions from this definition for industrial loan companies, credit card banks, limited purpose trust companies, credit unions, and thrifts.

Despite its seemingly narrow scope, this is a fundamentally important issue. The key to becoming a BHC subject to the many activity restrictions and regulatory intrusions is control or ownership of an entity that is considered a “bank” under the BHCA. Yet, contrary to what most ordinary Americans may think, what makes an institution a “bank” is not self-evident and depends on whether the statute defines it as such. What types of financial institutions that definition includes, or excludes, has changed several times since 1956. This Article presents a brief historical account of how, why, and with what consequences Congress periodically redefined the universe of “banks” and their heavily regulated BHC-parents. The Article discusses the potential impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on the continuing practical relevance of owning or controlling a “bank,” as opposed to any other financial institution specifically exempt from that category, and reflects on some of the broader lessons of the history of the BHCA for the ongoing regulatory reform.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 72

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 7, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Omarova, Saule T. and Tahyar, Margaret E., That Which We Call a Bank: Revisiting the History of Bank Holding Company Regulation in the United States (December 7, 2011). Review of Banking and Financial Law, Vol. 31, 2011-2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1969522

Contact Information

Saule T. Omarova (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
919-843-4356 (Phone)
Margaret E. Tahyar
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 746
Downloads: 198
Download Rank: 76,329
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  366

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 3.938 seconds