An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: Reframing the Debate About Law School Affirmative Action

Kiel, Daniel

Abstract

Footnotes (61)

Download This Paper | Share | Email |Add to Briefcase

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: Reframing the Debate About Law School Affirmative Action

Daniel Kiel

University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law

2010

Denver University Law Review, Vol. 88, p. 791, 2010
University of Memphis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 111

Abstract:
Written as an invited response to Prof. Richard Sander’s “Class in American Legal Education,” this piece argues that the debate about affirmative action in higher education has overemphasized the admissions process without focusing a sufficient amount of energy on addressing longer-term strategies that would make controversial admissions interventions unnecessary.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: December 9, 2011

Suggested Citation

Kiel, Daniel, An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: Reframing the Debate About Law School Affirmative Action (2010). Denver University Law Review, Vol. 88, p. 791, 2010; University of Memphis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 111. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1970014

Contact Information

Daniel Kiel (Contact Author)

University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law ( email )

One North Front Street
Memphis, TN 38103-2189
United States