In-House Counsel’s Role in the Structuring of Mortgage-Backed Securities
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Kathleen G. Cully
Kathleen G. Cully PLLC
Steven L. Schwarcz
Duke University School of Law
December 8, 2011
Wisconsin Law Review, Forthcoming
We briefly introduce the financial crisis and the role played by mortgage-backed securities. Then we describe the controversy at issue: whether, in order to own and enforce the mortgage loans backing those securities, a special-purpose vehicle “purchasing” mortgage loans must take physical delivery of the notes and security instruments in the precise manner specified by the sale agreement. Focusing on this controversy, we analyze (i) the extent, if any, that the controversy has merit; (ii) whether in-house counsel should have anticipated the controversy; and (iii) what, if anything, in-house counsel could have done to avert or, after it arose, to mitigate the controversy. Finally, we examine how the foregoing analysis can help to inform the broader issue of how in-house counsel should address complex legal transactions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: financial crisis, mortgage-backed securities
Date posted: December 10, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds