|
||||
|
||||
In-House Counsel’s Role in the Structuring of Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesShaun BarnesDuke University - School of Law Kathleen G. CullyKathleen G. Cully PLLC Steven L. SchwarczDuke University - School of Law December 8, 2011 Wisconsin Law Review, Forthcoming Abstract: We briefly introduce the financial crisis and the role played by mortgage-backed securities. Then we describe the controversy at issue: whether, in order to own and enforce the mortgage loans backing those securities, a special-purpose vehicle “purchasing” mortgage loans must take physical delivery of the notes and security instruments in the precise manner specified by the sale agreement. Focusing on this controversy, we analyze (i) the extent, if any, that the controversy has merit; (ii) whether in-house counsel should have anticipated the controversy; and (iii) what, if anything, in-house counsel could have done to avert or, after it arose, to mitigate the controversy. Finally, we examine how the foregoing analysis can help to inform the broader issue of how in-house counsel should address complex legal transactions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30 Keywords: financial crisis, mortgage-backed securities Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 10, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds