The Emergence of a Standards Market: Multiplicity of Sustainability Standards in the Global Coffee Industry
University of Warwick - Warwick Business School
University of Massachusetts at Boston - College of Management
Oliver von Hagen
International Trade Centre (UN/WTO)
July 1, 2012
Organization Studies, 33 (5/6), pp. 789-812, 2012
The growing number of voluntary standards for governing transnational arenas is presenting standards organizations with a problem. While claiming that they are pursuing shared, overarching objectives, at the same time, they are promoting their own respective standards that are increasingly similar. By developing the notion of ‘standards markets,’ this paper examines this tension and studies how different social movement and industry-driven standards organizations compete as well as collaborate over governance in transnational arenas. Based on an in-depth case study of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry, we find that the ongoing co-existence of multiple standards is being promoted by the interplay between two countervailing mechanisms: convergence and differentiation. In conjunction, these mechanisms are enabling the emergence and persistence of a market for standards through what we describe as meta-standardization of sustainable practices. Meta-standardization leads to convergence at the ‘rules of the game’ level, but allows also differentiation at the attributes level, which is enabling parties to create and maintain their own standards. Our study helps to advance the understanding of transnational governance by explaining the dynamics of competing and collaborating non-state actors in constituting a standards market.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43
Keywords: Certification, coffee industry, Fairtrade, meta-standardization, sustainability, standards markets, social movements, transnational governance
JEL Classification: F13, F16, F18, F53, F55, F59, L15, L32, O13, O19, P45, P48, Q11, Q17, Q28, Q56, L2, L5
Date posted: December 10, 2011 ; Last revised: July 24, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds