|
||||
|
||||
The Emergence of a Standards Market: Multiplicity of Sustainability Standards in the Global Coffee IndustryJuliane ReineckeUniversity of Warwick - Warwick Business School Stephan ManningUniversity of Massachusetts at Boston Oliver Von HagenInternational Trade Centre (UN/WTO) July 1, 2012 Organization Studies, 33 (5/6), pp. 789-812, 2012 Abstract: The growing number of voluntary standards for governing transnational arenas is presenting standards organizations with a problem. While claiming that they are pursuing shared, overarching objectives, at the same time, they are promoting their own respective standards that are increasingly similar. By developing the notion of ‘standards markets,’ this paper examines this tension and studies how different social movement and industry-driven standards organizations compete as well as collaborate over governance in transnational arenas. Based on an in-depth case study of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry, we find that the ongoing co-existence of multiple standards is being promoted by the interplay between two countervailing mechanisms: convergence and differentiation. In conjunction, these mechanisms are enabling the emergence and persistence of a market for standards through what we describe as meta-standardization of sustainable practices. Meta-standardization leads to convergence at the ‘rules of the game’ level, but allows also differentiation at the attributes level, which is enabling parties to create and maintain their own standards. Our study helps to advance the understanding of transnational governance by explaining the dynamics of competing and collaborating non-state actors in constituting a standards market.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43 Keywords: Certification, coffee industry, Fairtrade, meta-standardization, sustainability, standards markets, social movements, transnational governance JEL Classification: F13, F16, F18, F53, F55, F59, L15, L32, O13, O19, P45, P48, Q11, Q17, Q28, Q56, L2, L5 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 10, 2011 ; Last revised: July 24, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds