The 'Right to Be Forgotten' - Worth Remembering?
KU Leuven - Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP)
December 9, 2011
The ‘Right to be Forgotten’ – Worth remembering? Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages 143-152
In the last few years there has been a lot of buzz around a so-called ‘right to be forgotten.’ Especially in Europe, this catchphrase is heavily debated in the media, in court and by regulators. Since a clear definition has not emerged (yet), the following article will try to raise the veil on this vague concept. The first part will weigh the right's pros and cons against each other. It will appear that the ‘right to be forgotten’ clearly has merit, but needs better definition to avoid any negative consequences. As such, the right is nothing more than a way to give (back) individuals control over their personal data and make the consent regime more effective. The second part will then evaluate the potential implementation of the right. Measures are required at the normative, economical, technical, as well as legislative level. The article concludes by proposing a ‘right to be forgotten’ that is limited to data-processing situations where the individual has given his or her consent. Combined with a public-interest exception, this should (partially) restore the power balance and allow individuals a more effective control over their personal data.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: Right to be forgotten, Right to oblivion, Privacy, Personal Data, Europe, EU
Date posted: December 10, 2011 ; Last revised: March 11, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds