Where Hope meets Expectation on the Road between Human Rights Idealism and Pragmatism
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law
December 11, 2011
HUMAN RIGHTS: OLD PROBLEMS AND NEW POSSIBILITIES, Kinley, Sadurski, Walton, eds., Edward Elgar: United Kingdom, 2013
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/98
As a concept, human rights have application and impact at both the levels of an aspirational ideal and pragmatic implementation. The differences between the two perspectives are evident in rhetoric as well as legal and policy pronouncements, often rubbing along relatively uncontroversially in Western democracies. The prevailing circumstance of human rights today is in fact largely the result of a continuous process of compromise. Pendulum swings between ‘ought’ and ‘is’, with tendencies veering towards one or other end apparent across human rights as a whole, and within individual rights at different times and conditions. In this essay I discuss briefly five examples of human rights circumstance (moral; legal; political; economic and cultural) where the idealistic/pragmatist divide is especially sharp with the aims of illustrating the lines of transmission between human rights idealism and pragmatism, explaining the significance of the compromises reached in these examples, and highlighting the critical points of stress or opportunity exhibited in each.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: human rights, philosophy, international law, international relations
JEL Classification: K10, K30, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 12, 2011 ; Last revised: February 14, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.641 seconds