Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971419
 


 



The Fraud Exception to the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: How it Almost Wasn't (and Probably Shouldn't Be)


Steven N. Baker


McGuireWoods LLP

December 2011

Federal Courts Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 139, 2011

Abstract:     
The Rooker-Feldman doctrine, a jurisdictional doctrine preventing state-court losers from challenging state-court judgments in the lower federal courts, is not an obvious candidate for an equitable exception. It is, after all, a matter of federal subject matter jurisdiction, which is usually determined in a fairly mechanical manner: the district court either has jurisdiction or it does not.

But the Sixth Circuit has created just such an equitable exception to Rooker-Feldman, relying on res judicata case law from the Fourth Circuit. In doing so, the Sixth Circuit failed to explain the exception at all, including why an exception from a state preclusion doctrine such as res judicata should apply to a doctrine dealing with federal subject matter jurisdiction. In fact, all indications are that the Sixth Circuit simply made a mistake. This mistake lives on, however, and has spread to other courts, including the Ninth Circuit and several district courts. Other circuits, including the Second, Fifth, Seventh, and Eight Circuits, have rejected the exception, creating a situation ripe for Supreme Court intervention.

Rooker-Feldman is currently under a great deal of pressure. Nowhere is this more clear than in a context this Article addresses: plaintiffs challenging the validity of state-court foreclosure judgments in federal court. Should federal district courts apply Rooker-Feldman and decline jurisdiction over these challenges even if plaintiffs allege that lenders have achieved state-court foreclosure judgments through fraud? This Article resolves this dilemma currently faced by federal district and circuit courts across the country.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: Rooker-Feldman doctrine, Rooker, Feldman, fraud exception, res judicata

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 13, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Baker, Steven N., The Fraud Exception to the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: How it Almost Wasn't (and Probably Shouldn't Be) (December 2011). Federal Courts Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 139, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971419

Contact Information

Steven N. Baker (Contact Author)
McGuireWoods LLP ( email )
Bank of America Corporate Center
100 North Tryon Street, Ste. 2900
Charlotte, NC 28202-4011
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,013
Downloads: 228
Download Rank: 75,926

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.656 seconds