Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971442
 


 



Double Trouble: Double Jeopardy's Dual Sovereignty Exception and State Immigration Statutes


Gregory S. Schneider


Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP; University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

Gabriel J. Chin


University of California, Davis - School of Law

December 12, 2011

Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 28, p. 353, 2011

Abstract:     
Arizona, along with other states, has begun enacting laws attempting to control the movement of undocumented non-citizens within and across its borders. This extraordinary new wave of legislation creates a serious vertical separation of powers problem, risking frustration of federal immigration policy. Although there are a number of reasons that the state action may be unconstitutional, this article focuses on the heretofore unexplored role of the Double Jeopardy Clause.

The dual sovereignty exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution allows for successive prosecutions for the same offense, so long as each prosecuting jurisdiction bases the prosecution on its own authority. Two jurisdictions may not prosecute the same offense if each is drawing from the same source of power. States do not have their own authority to enact laws that regulate immigration. Defenders of state regulation do not deny federal primacy in the immigration area, but propose that states have been implicitly invited to assist in carrying out federal policy by enacting state laws.

This article suggests that courts should be slow to conclude that the federal government has invited the states to enact legislation. If states have the authority to prosecute immigration cases, that means that the federal government is divested of its power to act in any case where the state prosecutes first. A court, therefore, should uphold state immigration prosecutions only if it is convinced not only that the law is not preempted or unconstitutional for some other reason, but also that the United States intentionally decided to give the states authority to override federal decision making in the immigration arena.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: immigration, double jeopardy, federalism, preemption, SB1070

JEL Classification: K14, K23, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 13, 2011 ; Last revised: March 29, 2012

Suggested Citation

Schneider, Gregory S. and Chin, Gabriel J., Double Trouble: Double Jeopardy's Dual Sovereignty Exception and State Immigration Statutes (December 12, 2011). Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 28, p. 353, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971442

Contact Information

Gregory S. Schneider
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP ( email )
Cleveland, OH
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.squiresanders.com/gregory-schneider/
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
520-261-1381 (Phone)
Gabriel Jackson Chin (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
520-401-6586 (Phone)
530-754-5311 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 860
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 173,203

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds