Lying About Firm Performance: Evidence from a Survey in Nigeria
George R. G. Clarke
Texas A&M International University - A.R. Sanchez Jr., School of Business
December 13, 2011
It is difficult to be sure that managers in developing countries report financial information accurately and truthfully during firm surveys. The most common concern is that managers might under-report performance to avoid attracting attention from the tax authorities or corrupt bureaucrats. Using a method developed in the literature on corruption, this paper identifies managers who appear to be reticent or deceptive and compares their answers with the answers of non-reticent managers. The paper shows that reticent managers report that their firms are more, not less, productive than non-reticent managers. The paper then assesses possible reasons for this, finding that the most likely explanation is that reticent managers exaggerate performance so that they or their firms look good. Because past studies have found that reticent managers appear to lie about other aspects of firm and manager behavior - including under reporting corruption - this suggests that it will be difficult to fully assess how these behaviors affect firm performance unless reticence is controlled for.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: firm survey, reticence
JEL Classification: O11, C42working papers series
Date posted: December 14, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.406 seconds