Abstract

 
 

References (56)



 


 



Fight Alone or Together? The Need to Belong


Changxia Ke


Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance

December 1, 2011

Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2011-20

Abstract:     
This study compares contests with exogenous alliance formation under proportional sharing rules with contests among individual players in a laboratory setting. The standard equilibrium predictions are identical for all players because the proportional rule ensures the same payoff incentives for alliance and for single players (or players in individual contests). Alliance formation not only reduces the effort of alliance players but also discourages stand-alone players (especially women) from exerting substantial effort. Because over-dissipation is a wide-spread phenomenon in contest experiments, both alliance and stand-alone players benefit from alliance formation due to reduced over-dissipation. Behavioral factors such as the need to belong and the joy of winning can help reconcile the 'paradox of alliance formation'.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: alliance formation, contest and conflict, experiment

JEL Classification: D72, D74, C91

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 14, 2011 ; Last revised: July 4, 2012

Suggested Citation

Ke, Changxia, Fight Alone or Together? The Need to Belong (December 1, 2011). Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2011-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971641 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1971641

Contact Information

Changxia Ke (Contact Author)
Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance ( email )
Marstallplatz 1
Munich, 80539
Germany
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 232
Downloads: 28
References:  56

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.000 seconds