Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971840
 


 



Introduction: What Does Oakley Tell Us About the Failures of Constitutional Decision-Making?


Taylor Flynn


Western New England University School of Law

2004

Western New England Law Review, Vol. 26, p. 1, 2004

Abstract:     
The Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oakley, in which the court upheld a probation order prohibiting Mr. Oakley from fathering additional children until he could support them, is a compelling example of a troubling flaw in our constitutional jurisprudence. Absent the countervailing check perhaps provided by the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions, each path of doctrinal analysis, considered separately, arguably leads to the conclusion that the probation order is valid. This is so even though a number of institutional, structural, and process-based considerations converge to render the order's constitutionality highly suspect. The prevailing doctrinal approach is to disaggregate the case into distinct lines of argument. Do the poor constitute a "discrete and insular minority"? The articles by Professors Richard Cole, David Papke, and Bruce Miller take up the challenge of considering historical, legal, and cultural approaches to poverty. Are probation conditions subject to heightened scrutiny? Professor Jennifer Levi argues, in part, that even a radical change in the standard of review would not change the outcome of either the majority or dissenting opinions. Is this a case involving discrimination based on sex? Professor Jennifer Martin considers the impact that the Oakley decision may have on women, especially those subject to domestic violence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: probation conditions, State v. Oakley, standard of review, constitutional law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 14, 2011 ; Last revised: December 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Flynn, Taylor, Introduction: What Does Oakley Tell Us About the Failures of Constitutional Decision-Making? (2004). Western New England Law Review, Vol. 26, p. 1, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971840

Contact Information

Taylor Flynn (Contact Author)
Western New England University School of Law ( email )
1215 Wilbraham Road
Springfield, MA 01119
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 144
Downloads: 7

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.312 seconds