Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971955
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China


Keith J. Hand


University of California Hastings College of the Law

November 22, 2011

University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2011

Abstract:     
Beginning in 1999, a series of events generated speculation that the Chinese Party-state might be prepared to breathe new life into the country’s long dormant constitution. In recent years, as the Party-state has strictly limited constitutional adjudication and moved aggressively to contain some citizen constitutional activism, this early speculation has turned to pessimism about China’s constitutional trajectory. Such pessimism obscures recognition of alternative or hybrid pathways for resolving constitutional disputes in China. Despite recent developments, Chinese citizens have continued to constitutionalize a broad range of political-legal disputes and advance constitutional arguments in a variety of forums. This article argues that by shifting focus from the individual legal to the collective political dimension of constitutional law, a dimension dominant in China’s transitional one-party state, we can better understand the significance of the constitution in China and identify patterns of bargaining, consultation, and mediation across a range of both intrastate and citizen-state constitutional disputes. Administrative reconciliation and “grand mediation,” dispute resolution models at the core of recent political-legal shifts in China, emphasize such consultative practices. This zone of convergence reveals a potential transitional path for resolving constitutional disputes. Specifically, the Party-state could choose to adapt and apply the grand mediation model in the context of constitutional disputes. Grand mediation involves a multilevel, Party-state political consultation that preserves a limited but meaningful role for the judiciary. An adaptation of the grand mediation framework would provide an indigenous dispute resolution model for resolving constitutional disputes, regularize informal constitutional dispute resolution practices, and bring judges to the constitutional interpretation table. At the same time, it would take account of the realities of China’s current political environment. Chinese reformers could use such a mechanism (or existing informal dispute resolution practices) to advance their long-term goals of facilitating citizen-state consultation, reform concessions, and the diffusion of constitutional norms through the Chinese polity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 109

Keywords: China, Constitution, constitutional law, constitutional disputes, dispute resolution, law and politics, rights lawyers, weiquan, constitutional review, grand mediation, constitutional court, National People's Congress

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 17, 2011 ; Last revised: August 5, 2014

Suggested Citation

Hand, Keith J., Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China (November 22, 2011). University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1971955

Contact Information

Keith J. Hand (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,270
Downloads: 555
Download Rank: 26,883
Citations:  2
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Can Citizens Vitalize China's Constitution?
By Keith Hand

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds