Managing the Urban Commons
Nicole Stelle Garnett
Notre Dame Law School
November 14, 2011
Essay for the November 2011 University of Pennsylvania Law Review Symposium on “New Dimensions in Property Theory” 160 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1995 (2012)
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 11-44
Over the past several decades, debates about the appropriate tools of commons management have played themselves out in a particularly illuminating way in the management of urban public spaces. Some commentators urge, a là Garrett Hardin, that government coercion is needed to restore order to the urban commons. Others urge the privatization or quasi-privatization of urban public-spaces. On the ground in American cities, these theoretical arguments have been translated into concrete policies, especially policing strategies (e.g., order-maintenance and community policing) and urban development strategies (e.g., business improvement districts). This is an opportune time to reexamine the commons-management questions raised by these policies. The current economic crisis is forcing cities to scale back law enforcement efforts, as well as limiting the financing available to fund sublocal investments in urban public spaces. It is possible that these pressures will lead the current urban-commons compromise to unravel — leading to less public regulation of urban public spaces, more pressure for private regulation, or both. Using these tensions as a starting point, this Essay, which was written for a Pennsylvania Law Review symposium on “New Dimensions in Property Theory,” reflects critically upon the optimal regulation of urban public spaces as well as the possibility of cooperative commons management arising in the absence of government coercion.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: Order maintenance, broken windows, business improvement districts, privatization, urban, public spaces, commons
JEL Classification: H7, H82, K11, O1, O2Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 15, 2011 ; Last revised: December 12, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds