Mixed Statements: The Safe Harbor's Rocky Shore
Wendy Gerwick Couture
University of Idaho College of Law
December 14, 2011
Securities Regulation Law Journal, Vol. 39, p. 257, 2011
In this essay, the author analyzes how to apply the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’s safe harbor for forward-looking statements to “mixed statements” – in which statements about the past or present are intertwined with statements about the future. The author identifies three categories of mixed statement that are the subject of frequent litigation, demonstrates the courts’ disagreement about their treatment, and – drawing from the statutory text and policy rationales – recommends how the safe harbor should apply to each category of statement.
In particular, the author argues that (1) statements of historical or current fact that underlie predictions should not be protected by the safe harbor; (2) statements about the present that necessarily incorporate predictions should be protected by the safe harbor; and (3) statements that contain both present and future components should be bifurcated, with the safe harbor protecting only those portions that predict.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: securities litigation, forward-looking statements, safe harbor, Private Securities Litigation Reform ActAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 15, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds