Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1972433
 


 



Lawyers' Identities, Client Selection and the Antidiscrimination Principle: Thoughts on the Sanctioning of Judith Nathanson


Bruce K. Miller


Western New England University School of Law

1998

Western New England Law Review, Vol. 20, p. 93, 1998

Abstract:     
The Author discusses how the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination might justifiably apply the Public Accommodations Statute to the client selection practices of some, perhaps many, lawyers. But it should leave Judith Nathanson alone. Nathanson's decision to represent only women in divorce cases is protected by the First Amendment, not because she is entitled as a lawyer to indulge whatever biases she chooses in her selection of clients, but because, as a lawyer of integrity who has melded her personal values and professional skills in service to the profession's best ideals, she is entitled to represent her chosen clients as she sees fit.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: antidiscrimination, Judith Nathanson, client selection, ethics and professional responsibility

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 15, 2011 ; Last revised: December 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Miller, Bruce K., Lawyers' Identities, Client Selection and the Antidiscrimination Principle: Thoughts on the Sanctioning of Judith Nathanson (1998). Western New England Law Review, Vol. 20, p. 93, 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1972433

Contact Information

Bruce K. Miller (Contact Author)
Western New England University School of Law ( email )
1215 Wilbraham Road
Springfield, MA 01119
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 219
Downloads: 21

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.234 seconds