Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1972920
 


 



Some Modest Proposals for Challenging Established Dress Code Jurisprudence


Jennifer Levi


Western New England University School of Law

December 15, 2007

Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 14, p. 243, 2007

Abstract:     
Historically, most courts have sustained employer-imposed, gender-based dress codes. Two well-established exceptions to the rule exist for dress codes that either (1) objectify or sexualize women or (2) allow for flexibility of standards for male employees' appearance but require stricter rules for women. A third, still-evolving exception has recently developed regarding challenges to dress codes by transgender litigants. Despite this recent progress, however, the classical gender-based dress code -- requiring women to conform to feminine stereotypes and men to conform to masculine stereotypes -- has, up to the present, been sustained by a majority of the courts time and again. The Author discusses two cases that offer insights as to why dress codes generally survive challenges, while also portending strategies for reversing this longstanding trend.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: dress code, transgender person, gender, sexuality and the law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 15, 2011 ; Last revised: December 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Levi, Jennifer, Some Modest Proposals for Challenging Established Dress Code Jurisprudence (December 15, 2007). Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 14, p. 243, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1972920

Contact Information

Jennifer Levi (Contact Author)
Western New England University School of Law ( email )
1215 Wilbraham Road
Springfield, MA 01119
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 287
Downloads: 43

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds