Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1973144
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Preliminary Injunctions: The Varying Standards


Arthur D. Wolf


Western New England University School of Law

December 16, 2011

Western New England Law Review, Vol. 7, p. 173, 1984

Abstract:     
The Author undertakes a survey in this Article which shows that the Supreme Court and the courts of appeals have not articulated or applied consistent criteria for preliminary injunctive relief. Their decisions have described a sinuous path through primary standards, alternative tests, and sliding scale variations. Part of the difficulty may be because the Supreme Court has not taken a firm hand in resolving conflicts between and among the circuits on critical issues involving interlocutory injunctions. In addition while the courts of appeals make reference to each others' opinions, they have not demonstrated a desire to achieve uniformity in their approaches to interim relief. In some cases, the non-uniformity is intra-circuit as well as inter-circuit. Because there are so many currently applicable tests and variations, a moving party asserting the same facts and legal principles in different circuits could easily secure different results on motions for preliminary relief. While non-uniformity of decisions may serve a creative purpose in the short run, over time it tends to breed disrespect for and discontent of the law and advance the perception that judicial decision making is largely arbitrary. Furthermore from a practical perspective, non-uniformity, especially of the intra-circuit variety, tends to undermine the goal of predictability which is vital for lawyer and client in ordering their affairs to conform with established legal norms. If the principles are uncertain, both counseling and compliance become chancy at best.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: preliminary injunctions, civil procedure

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 17, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Wolf, Arthur D., Preliminary Injunctions: The Varying Standards (December 16, 2011). Western New England Law Review, Vol. 7, p. 173, 1984. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1973144

Contact Information

Arthur D. Wolf (Contact Author)
Western New England University School of Law ( email )
1215 Wilbraham Road
Springfield, MA 01119
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 142
Downloads: 16
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.203 seconds