Epistemic Intuitions in Fake-Barn Thought Experiments
University of Pittsburgh
CUNY - The Graduate Center
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; University of Sheffield
University of Pittsburgh - Department of History and Philosophy of Science
April 5, 2013
In epistemology, fake-barn thought experiments are often taken to be intuitively clear cases in which a justified true belief does not qualify as knowledge. We report a study designed to determine whether non-philosophers share this intuition. The data suggest that while participants are less inclined to attribute knowledge in fake-barn cases than in unproblematic cases of knowledge, they nonetheless do attribute knowledge to protagonists in fake-barn cases. Moreover, the intuition that fake-barn cases do count as knowledge is negatively correlated with age; older participants are less likely than younger participants to attribute knowledge in fake-barn cases. We also found that increasing the number of defeaters (fakes) does not decrease the inclination to attribute knowledge.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: experimental philosophy, intuitions, epistemology, fake barn cases, age differencesworking papers series
Date posted: December 17, 2011 ; Last revised: July 29, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.234 seconds