Abstract

 
 

References (9)



 


 



International Transmission of Shocks, Money Illusion and the Velocity of Money


Teresa Sousa


affiliation not provided to SSRN

2011

Economics Discussion Paper No. 2011-49

Abstract:     
Money illusion is frequently invoked and frequently resisted by economists. Resisted as it contradicts the maximizing paradigm of microeconomic theory and invoked since a tendency to think in nominal rather than real terms becomes evident in the behavior of agents. This paper rationalizes money illusion in an stylized open economy model considering that private agents learn nominal aggregate demand at a level different from the one imposed by rationality. We find that the welfare effects of a productivity shock are increasing in the degree of money illusion and decreasing in the degree of openness of the economy. Furthermore we introduce a velocity of money shock revisiting the Quantity Theory of Money within the open economy micro-founded framework. An incomplete information game between Home and Foreign policymakers with monetary policy rules is developed, where sudden unstable financial conditions arise in one country, to find that allowing for velocity shocks reinforces the need for optimal monetary policy rules and to open the economies in order to avoid welfare costs.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Optimal monetary policy, open economy, international transmission mechanism, money illusion, velocity of money, nominal rigidities

JEL Classification: E31, E52, F42

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 19, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Sousa, Teresa, International Transmission of Shocks, Money Illusion and the Velocity of Money (2011). Economics Discussion Paper No. 2011-49. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974365 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1974365

Contact Information

Teresa Sousa (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 92
Downloads: 11
References:  9

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds