From Fragmentation to Constitutionalization
Harlan Grant Cohen
University of Georgia School of Law; University of Georgia - Dean Rusk International Law Center
December 19, 2011
Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, Vol. 24, 2011
UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-14
This short essay, prepared for a panel on “The Impact of a Wider Dissemination of Human Rights Norms: Fragmentation or Unity?,” explores the connection between two popular, but seemingly contradictory discourses in international law: fragmentation and constitutionalization. After disentangling and categorizing the various types of fragmentation international law may be experiencing, the essay focuses in on one form in particular, the “fragmentation of the legal community.” This most radical version of fragmentation, the essay argues, has spurred a number of responses, many of which suggest the beginnings of a constitutional conflicts regime for international law. The essay ends by suggesting and exploring three types of constitutional conflicts rules already in limited use: (1) constitutional comity rules, (2) constitutional hierarchy rules, and (3) constitutional abstention rules.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: international law, fragmentation, constitutionalization, human rights
JEL Classification: K33
Date posted: December 20, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds