|
||||
|
||||
Beyond Ex Post Expediency - An Ex Ante View of Rescission and RestitutionRichard R. W. BrooksYale University - Law School Alexander StremitzerUCLA School of Law December 23, 2011 Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, p. 1171, 2011 Yale Law & Economics Research Paper 443 UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper 12-04 Abstract: It is commonly held that if getting a contractual remedy was costless and fully compensatory, rescission followed by restitution would not exist as a remedy for breach of contract. This claim, we will demonstrate, is not correct. Rescission and restitution offer more than remedial convenience. Rational parties, we argue, would often desire a right of rescission followed by restitution even if damages were fully compensatory and costless to enforce. The mere presence of a threat to rescind, even if not carried out, exerts an effect on the behavior of parties. Parties can enlist this effect to increase the value of contracting.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15 Keywords: contracts, rescission, rejection, restitution, optional remedies JEL Classification: K12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 25, 2011 ; Last revised: February 18, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds