Two Cheers for the Bundle-of-Sticks Metaphor, Three Cheers for Merrill and Smith
Robert C. Ellickson
Yale Law School
September 1, 2011
Econ Journal Watch, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 215, September 2011
Viewing property rights as a “bundle of sticks” can be descriptively clarifying because the law commonly entitles an owner of a particular resource to split up entitlements in it. Nonetheless, Thomas Merrill and Henry Smith, the most prominent critics of the metaphor, assert that this conception both ignores the existence of various legal constraints on the decomposition of property rights, and also encourages lawmakers to support the excessive splintering of entitlements. These concerns are well-grounded. More controversial are Merrill and Smith’s inclinations to equate private property with property generally, to deny that human capital can be characterized as property, and to assert that affirmative duties never attach to property ownership.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: property, bundle of rights, exclusion, legal realism, law and economics
JEL Classification: A1, K00, K1Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 28, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds