Defending the Right to Do Wrong
Ori J. Herstein
Senior Lecturer, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law; Regular Visiting Lecturer, King's College London - Dickson Poon School of Law
December 19, 2011
Law and Philosophy, 2012
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-05
Are there moral rights to do moral wrong? A right to do wrong is a right that others not interfere with the right-holder’s wrongdoing. It is a right against enforcement of duty, that is a right that others not interfere with one’s violation of one’s own obligations. The strongest reason for moral rights to do moral wrong is grounded in the value of personal autonomy. Having a measure of protected choice (that is a right) to do wrong is a condition for an autonomous life and for autonomous moral self-constitution. This view has its critics. Responding to these objections reveals that none refute the coherence of the concept of a ‘moral right to do moral wrong.’ At most, some objections successfully challenge the weight and frequency of the personal autonomy reasons for such rights. Autonomy-based moral rights to do moral wrong are therefore conceptually possible as well as, at least on occasion, actual.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: rights, right theory, right to do wrong, morality, ethics, moral philosophy, jurisprudence, integrity, autonomy, moral rights
Date posted: January 3, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.282 seconds