|
||||
|
||||
Commitment in Marketing Channels: Mitigator or Aggravator of the Effects of Destructive Acts?Stephen K. KimIowa State University Jonathan Hibbardaffiliation not provided to SSRN Scott D. SwainNortheastern University September 21, 2011 Journal of Retailing, Forthcoming Abstract: This research examines how a firm’s relationship commitment influences its extra-role behavior after an intentional destructive act by a partner. The results of two studies – one a national survey of dealers for a consumer durable product and the other a set of three experiments involving business-to-business managers – show that the outcome of a destructive act depends on the type of commitment: whether the commitment is affective, calculative, or normative. Under relational distress caused by a supplier’s destructive act, high affective commitment induces more negative extra-role behaviors, high calculative commitment induces more positive extra-role behaviors, while high normative commitment induces little change in extra-role behavior. Process tests indicate that each of these effects on extra-role behavior is explained (mediated) by psychological responses that are distinct for the type of commitment involved.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50 Keywords: Dealer commitment, Supplier destructive acts, Extra-role behavior JEL Classification: D21, D74, M31 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 4, 2012Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.563 seconds