Tenure: A Conscientious Objective

William W. Van Alstyne

Duke University School of Law; William & Mary Law School

January 4, 2012

Change Magazine, p. 37, 1994
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-195

This critical response to James O'Toole's "Tenure: A Conscientious Objection" argues that O'Toole's argument that the tenure system is unnecessary under due process subverts the purpose of tenure elimination, that is, a healthy rate of teacher turnover.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 2

Keywords: tenure, professor, university

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: January 4, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Van Alstyne, William W., Tenure: A Conscientious Objective (January 4, 2012). Change Magazine, p. 37, 1994; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-195. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1979443

Contact Information

William W. Van Alstyne (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 234
Downloads: 10

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.250 seconds