Tenure: A Conscientious Objective
William W. Van Alstyne
Duke University School of Law; William & Mary Law School
January 4, 2012
Change Magazine, p. 37, 1994
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-195
This critical response to James O'Toole's "Tenure: A Conscientious Objection" argues that O'Toole's argument that the tenure system is unnecessary under due process subverts the purpose of tenure elimination, that is, a healthy rate of teacher turnover.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 2
Keywords: tenure, professor, universityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 4, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.344 seconds