Bilski v. Kappos: Everything Old is New Again
Joseph Scott Miller
University of Georgia Law School
January 5, 2012
Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 15, 2011
My goal in this brief Essay is to introduce the symposium papers by describing the basics of the Bilski case. I also offer a brief thought about where interested observers might turn next in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's § 101 jurisprudence for insights about how that court may implement Bilski's unmistakable revival of Benson and Fook. Specifically, now that the 15-year Alappat/State Street misadventure, with its patent-maximizing "useful, concrete, and tangible result" standard, has come to an end, it is time to revisit the reasoning and results in a rich trove of cases from the Federal Circuit and its predecessor, the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA).
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: Intellectual Property, Patents, Bilski v. Kappos, Process, 35 USC 101
JEL Classification: K19, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 6, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds