|
||||
|
||||
Merger Control: Key International Norms and DifferencesD. Daniel SokolUniversity of Florida - Levin College of Law; University of Minnesota School of Law; George Washington University Law School Competition Law Center William BlumenthalClifford Chance LLP January 8, 2012 INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON COMPETITION LAW, Ariel Ezrachi ed., Edward Elgar, 2012 Abstract: More than ninety jurisdictions have some form of merger control regime under their antitrust or competition laws. Numerous other jurisdictions lack a formal merger control mechanism, but reserve the right to review and challenge mergers under their general competition laws, sector-specific laws, or regional trade agreements. Observing the substantive approaches to merger analysis across jurisdictions, one sees many commonalities, but also some important areas of variation. The procedural approaches across merger control regimes are even more varied. This chapter seeks to identify and catalog the key substantive and procedural norms and differences in various systems, to provide a sense of the direction of the academic scholarship on various issues and to offer some analytical underpinnings for optimal merger enforcement based on the reality of merger control in recent years. We conclude with suggestions regarding the future direction of merger control.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36 Keywords: antitrust, mergers, merger control, competition law, international antitrust, comparative antitrust JEL Classification: K21, L49, G34 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 9, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.625 seconds